Conferencer

Compare

Conferencer vs Oxford Abstracts.

Oxford Abstracts is abstract management and conference platform for academic events. Conferencer is free, open-source software for the same job — the call, the review, the decisions, the onboarding, the agenda and the public site — that you run yourself.

What it costs

Oxford Abstracts: $890–$3,450 / event. Conferencer: $0.

Oxford Abstracts
$890–$3,450 / event
The three paid tiers are one-off costs per event: $890 for abstract management, $2,290 for the standard conference platform, $3,450 for professional. Add-ons run $150 to $850 each — a second submission stream is $850, certificates $150, the website builder $200. Delegate registration takes 2.5% of ticket revenue, capped at $5,000 per event. A limited free package handles basic collection.

Conferencer

$0, always

MIT licensed and self-hosted: no plan, no per-event fee, no limit on submissions, no share of your revenue. Your only bill is the box it runs on, and a $5 VPS covers it.

What Oxford Abstracts is

Abstract management and conference platform for academic events.

Oxford Abstracts is a hosted abstract-management and conference platform aimed at academic and research events: submission forms, reviewing, decisions, a program builder, a poster gallery, delegate registration and a conference website builder.

Who it is for: Academic, scientific and research conferences collecting abstracts.

Side by side

The same job, line by line.

The Oxford Abstracts column states only what their own public pages state; the sources are linked at the foot of the page. The Conferencer column is checkable in the repository.

Published price

Conferencer$0 — MIT licensed, no plans, no per-event fee

Oxford Abstracts$890–$3,450 per event, plus add-ons and 2.5% of registration revenue

Self-hosted

ConferencerYes — one container, one SQLite file, Node 22+

Oxford AbstractsNo — hosted only

Submissions

Conferencer14 field types, show-when logic, saved drafts, per-person limits, close dates

Oxford AbstractsFully customisable forms, unlimited submissions on every package

Committee review

ConferencerMulti-round plans, anonymized rounds, 8 scorecard types, conflict-of-interest recusal, auto-distribution with caps

Oxford AbstractsCustom review forms, reviewer assignment, abstract concealment on higher tiers

Speaker onboarding

ConferencerOnboarding tasks, versioned file requests, a deliverables matrix, a speaker portal

Oxford AbstractsCertificates and a poster gallery on the top tier

Program builder

ConferencerRooms grid with drag-and-drop, blocked room clashes, speaker-clash warnings, publish diff

Oxford AbstractsProgram builder from the Standard tier up

Registration

ConferencerNot included — Conferencer runs the programme, not ticketing

Oxford AbstractsBuilt in, at 2.5% of revenue capped at $5,000

Public site

ConferencerA full public site — sessions, speakers, agenda, itinerary, gallery, personal .ics schedule — no login

Oxford AbstractsA conference website builder, as a $200 add-on or on the top tier

Getting started

ConferencerClone, npm run seed, and click around a real demo conference

Oxford AbstractsTheir team sets the event up with you, in under an hour

Where Oxford Abstracts is genuinely better

Academic fixtures
Poster gallery, certificates, abstract concealment and multi-stage streams — abstracts first, full papers after — are built for research meetings.
Registration built in
Ticketing and delegate management live in the same tool. Conferencer deliberately does not touch ticketing.
White-glove setup
Their team sets the event up with you and guides you through the stages. Conferencer hands you a seeded demo and good defaults instead.
A free package
Basic collection for small events at no cost, with unlimited submissions.

Where Conferencer differs

No meter running
No per-event fee, no add-on grid, no percentage of your ticket revenue. The price does not move when your conference does well.
Onboarding after the decision
Accepting opens each speaker a portal and assigns their tasks — bio, headshot, slides — with versioned files and a deliverables matrix.
You can read the source
MIT licensed, plain SQL, the schema in one file. Changing a review rule is a pull request against your own fork.

Sources for every claim about Oxford Abstracts on this page, read on 12 August 2026: oxfordabstracts.com/pricing · oxfordabstracts.com. If a figure here has gone stale, the linked page is the truth.